In 1534, Charles I of Spain ordered the first survey of a proposed canal route through the Isthmus of Panama. More than three centuries passed before the first construction was started. The French labored 20 years, beginning in 1880, but disease and financial problems defeated them.
In 1903, Panama and the United States signed a treaty by which the United States undertook to construct an interoceanic ship canal across the Isthmus of Panama. The following year, the United States purchased from the French Canal Company its rights and properties for $40 million and began construction. The monumental project was completed in ten years at a cost of about $387 million. Since 1903 the United States has invested about $3 billion in the Canal enterprise, approximately two-thirds of which has been recovered.
The building of the Panama Canal involved three main problems -- engineering, sanitation, and organization. Its successful completion was due principally to the engineering and administrative skills of such men as John F. Stevens and Col. George W. Goethals, and to the solution of extensive health problems by Col. William C. Gorgas.
The engineering problems involved digging through the Continental Divide; constructing the largest earth dam ever built up to that time; designing and building the most massive canal locks ever envisioned; constructing the largest gates ever swung; and solving environmental problems of enormous proportions.The price for this masterpiece of ingeenering was of 500 lives for every mile of the canal.
Now, more than 80 years after the first official ocean-to- ocean transit of the waterway, the United States and Panama have embarked on a partnership for the management, operation and defense of the Panama Canal. Under two new treaties signed in a ceremony at OAS headquarters in Washington, D.C., on September 7, 1977, the Canal will be operated until the turn of the century under arrangements designed to strengthen the bonds of friendship and cooperation between the two countries. The treaties were approved by Panama in a plebiscite on October 23, 1977, and the U.S. Senate gave its advice and consent to their ratificaton in March and April 1978. The new treaties went into effect October 1, 1979.
Map of the Panama Canal
The location of the Panama Canal is in a strategic location, the canal a 51 mile waterway is a dramatic short cut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. By using the canal rather than going around the tip of South America, a ship can save up to 8,000 miles when traveling from New York city to San Francisco if he chooses to go through the canal. The time and energy saved when using the canal is the reason of why the canal is a necesary passage through the Americas.
In the late 1800s the United States launched into the international world affairs, looking forward to gain control of new markets and foreign territories. Speaking to the Republican convention in1900, vice-presidential candidate Teddy Roosevelt reflected the growing wish of Americans to play a new role as world power:
"We stand on the thresholdof a new century big with the fate of mighty nations. It rests with us now to decide whether in the openinig years of that century we shall march forward to fresh triumphs or whether at the outset we shall cripple ourselves for the contest. Is america a weakling, to shrink from the work of the great powers? No. The young giant of the west stands on a continent and clasps the crest of an ocean in either hand. Our nation, glorious in you and strength, looks into the future with eager eyes and rejoices. . .to run a race"
Theodore Roosevelt
The United States was in the look out to control the canal that would shortly be bulit in Central America, either the Panama Canal or the Nicaragua Canal. The United States and Brittain had signed a treaty shortly before in which this to powerfull nations would make their way through to gain control of the canal, the Panama Canal was started first and therefore it was checked out by these two nations. But mean while the Panama Canal was being built Britain had some trouble, its colonies in Africa had set a rebelion and Britain was distracted from the Canal. Seeing that Britain couldn't take care of the Canal the United States proceded itself to take the control over the Canal. The canal was being built by a French company that went into the bankrupt when the building of the canal was halfway through, The united States bught the legal rights for the construction of the canal, now the negotiation phase began. The U.S wanted to build the canal and afterwords manage it, Colombia asked for too much money to give the U.S this rights, the same money the U.S was not willing to pay. Things where different with Panama people, they wanted to make the deal, so they set forward into forming a rebel to become independent, they had several advantages such as: the distraction of Colombia because it was fighting the war of the 1000 days, the backup that the U.S ships that "coincidentialy" had arrived to Panama gave to the Panama sea ports, and above all the backup of the U.S. Thats how Colombia lost Panama & it's canal.
Why did the U.S. had to help the panamanian revolt? Even though they do not accept it, it is obvious that the US helped finance this revolt so they could keep the canal. The United States was so greedy she couldn´t accept those lands belonged to Colombia and because they had a powerful army, she wanted to steal it by force. The US had to respect that the province of Panama belonged to Colombia, and if she was that interested in constructing the canal she would of negotiated directly with Colombia. Another important point was that Colombia was the rightfull owner of the isthmus and if they raised the price of the land to the United States, they were in full right to do it because they were the rightful owner. No matter how mad the US would of gotten, if they wanted to raise the price 10 times they could of done it. If panamanians revolted against the colombian government, it wasn´t american business to interfere blocking all colombian ships trying to crush the revolt. That revolt was local business and the US should of butt out. No matter how strong a country is, it has to respect its neighbor no matter how weak he is. I bet you that if Colombia wouldn´t of had the 1000 day war, the South Americans would of crushed the rebellion, and the USS Nashville would be a really cool scuba diving wreck visited by thousands of colombian divers yearly.