Chronos Apollonios' "Home On Olympus"

The Science That Is Magick, Part One

All I can tell you is if the wildest things imaginable turn out to be true about them, don’t be surprised. If the ozone layer is decaying because we don’t bring in fresh offerings of water lily blossoms every five hundred years anymore, don’t be surprised. After all, if you were going to put a dielectric resonator on, say, Venus to convert the hostile environment into something more earthlike, what would it look like, what would it be made of, and how would it work? Not that I’d insist the fate of the earth depends on them, but then again you can get some pretty nice ideas working backwards. The great scientist, Michael Faraday, seems to have done quite well with juxtaposition, however presumptuous, having produced dynamos and generators that way.

I can also suggest that what Beauval and Hancock are publicizing about the dating of the Sphinx to the last age of Leo by calculating the history of the earth's orbit in such a way as to include it's precession not only may indicate that they had immense concerns about the consistency of such a feature and the ramifications of its inconsistency, but please note carefully, they may have thusly marked events in the "macrocosm" to alert us to the "microcosm". In the very same way that Richard Hoagland has proceeded through the riddles of the Martian landscape, that is, by presuming there is a communication, they may be alerting us to the significance of Atomic precession, part of a package of science phenomenology that may facilitate all kinds of technological miracle making. It's an important part of the topics of time-reversal and atomic memory- topics that could be developed to accomplish many magicks but particularly such deeds as resurrection--immortality! (Leos can be notably generous, and heroic, we are told...)

What "real" scientists seem to discover about them is wild enough on it’s own; Science (yes, "the", hard-boiled, skeptical and straight-laced Science magazine. Drop by any public library and look for yourself how "New Age" it’s not) once published some studies detailing cosmic ray readings at the Pyramids... they still don’t seem to be able to explain the results they got.

There are also countless collections of amazing things the ancient Egyptians did and discovered, and even their oddest-sounding notions, such as one particular pregnancy test in a medical papyrus, continually astound modern people with their intelligence, efficiency and wisdom when they are examined carefully.

KeelyNet pages like the one detailing the ancient "Ship-of-Heaven" have long shown astonishing murals from the temple of Hathor at Dendera (left), also recognized by Charles Berlitz, author of "The Bermuda Triangle" and "The Philadelphia Experiment". Amargi's pages (whose excellence blinks in and out of reality like ships in said Triangle and Experiment) have recently noted the striking similarity between these devices and Crookes tubes.

In truth, I’d like to devote this page to as close as I can manage to serious discussion about some less attended aspects of ancient Egyptian science. Having experimentally identified the ancient "tet" or "djed" as a battery, and if so, pretty patently, a wireless one, if one can come to terms with that, it’s a good foothold to come to grips with more of the ancient wisdom.

My problem, of course, is that I cannot quite tell you exactly what it is. The possibilities are delightful, but many.

It is often shown layered; many cut aways depict it as something looking much like a dry cell battery. Some renditions even show what may be a cathode running down the center of it, possibly carbon, similar to both modern batteries and to the ancient Persian battery.

Support for its transmission capabilities can either be accepted from the interpretation of the tet that appears in "Pyramid Energy: The Philosophy of God, The Science of Man" by Dean and Mary Hardy, and Marjorie and Kenneth Killick", or inferred that the array of rings is like the configuration of the master magnet, of which it’s noted that these rings act like the secondary in a transformer, hence a coil device need not be present.

One of my problems with the interpretation in this source is that it seems almost superfluous to suggest that one tet is used as a transmitter and another as a receiver without having a clear idea what else is happening in between. I also have a slight problem with a labeling of the parts and function of the tet by the same authors; one classic scene where an apparent cathode can be actually seen extending through the layers of material in the tet has an ankh resting atop the tet, and they may have presumed it a functional literalism rather than simply an associative message saying the two are linked; this does not mean they must be physically in contact. From a larger sampling of artworks, any antennae that are shown do not seem to be requisite, but the secondary made of the rings may be adequate in itself.

My greatest problem with the Hardy and Killick work of course is that in spite of its uncanny brilliance, it is mentioned that Egyptian priests would connect the tet to ground by urinating on the mat it was sitting on. One could see where they may have gotten such an idea, and furthermore think of a number of radionic reasons to do such a thing as expose the tet to a urine sample, and "theoretically" this is the high frequency electricity that refuses to penetrate people's exteriors to electrocute them. But then again, watching a weenie explode in the microwave is certainly ample cause to inspire sobering questions about whether or not it is wise to connect a mucous membrane of a male organ directly to such a power supply by the conduction of a stream of flowing urine, high frequency or not. I don't recall Nikola Tesla sticking high frequency electrodes in anyone's mouth, and most of all, their text says this was done when "water was not available". When, pray tell, was water not available along the Nile? Shades of flying ointments, don't try it at home. Consider yourself warned.

My own feeling is that the output of a tet, perhaps a single one by itself, can be easily induced into the ring of an ankh, and then input can be applied to moderate or modulate the energy, much like a transistor.

Beyond simple applications such as those suggested by the text in question, any interaction with the wielder of an ankh, such as galvanic skin response or capacitance tuning, familiar modern principles, may be an opportunity for biofeedback and even holographic data from the brain to enter the current flow. Hence the ankh and tet pair could be used like a powerful electronic magick wand, ultimately limited only by the humanity and skill of its operator.

There are many Egyptian artworks that show something coming from the ankh in this way, and other of "annointings" and various deeds which look a lot more like someone is applying electromagnetic waves to various purposes. Healing, and everyday tasks such as warming food or sanitation, perhaps, may be likely candidates.

Indeed, the Hardy and Killick work has the incredible detail of recognizing not only the nature of the stylized "hands" that come from the tet as transmissions, they have etymologically examined the very word transmission and observed that, somehow, it contains the German root for hand, "-mitten", which we use in English, of course, to denote winter gloves. The "hands" that are seen in Egyptian artwork, on impossibly long thin "arms", proceed in different works from the tet, the ankh, and from the sun itself. The page on ancient Hindu "Solar Science" on this site examines this in more detail, much as the "Star Way" page at this site shows an example of ancient Egyptian knowledge of the atomic numbers of elements as evidenced by a chariot found in Tutankhamen's tomb.

It may also be significant that the headgear seen on the little figures at the bottom left and right of the tet has somehow been christened a "mitre", either because English was engendered by mystic intiates, or because the languages assimilated were profusely full of mystic science roots, references, and terms...or for perhaps both reasons.

Was the modern battery, prototyped by this voltaic pile (images at left and right), derived directly from the ancient Egyptian battery without them being credited, at a time when Egyptian art and architecture was also being borrowed by America's founders? Nikola Tesla, the prodigal master inventor, spoke himself of his electrical and wireless electrical arts being centuries old.

But still, without a sample and without analysis, what is such a battery as the tet running on?

Chances are, that over centuries, many clever methods of doing various things were worked out, and this going for the contents of the tet as well. Hence, one version could well contain a number of iron compounds as the artworks may suggest, another could easily contain a number of floral pigments whose electrochemical values may have been used to put the power in first motion.

The tet may well have powers of amplification inherent, we need not insist that the material be blatantly powerful, although we may yet have a lot to learn about the powers of certain plant materials. Certain techniques may derive a considerable amount of power from such stuff, and yet leave these devices with an amazing "shelf life".

At left: A secret science reserved for Egyptain preists? Or like all good things, did the Aztec possess their own form of the Tet? Although it's described by the "experts" as "an arrow", that's what this artifact seems to be telling us. The ancient wisdom, like the pyramids, was universal. I am adding Northern Amerindian artworks to the magnetic propulsion page that show the a similar style of tet on a boat, and very probably propelling it, that comes from the same article on mound builders that displays an Egyptian-sytle pyramid in ancient North America.

To it's right is a Hittite artwork. In O.R. Gurney's "The Hittites" (pg. 149), it is captioned, "Bas-relief from Alaja Huyuk. King worshipping bull, as symbol of the Weather-God". (There's no comment at all on the obvious tet here.) At least that's as close as you can get when you have thrown out the possibility that the ancients were intelligent. The science then inevitably becomes "magic" or "religion", involvement becomes "worship", electricity becomes "gods" of lightning, thunder, and weather. The bull is very likely yet another symbol of the heavy electron science, the science of muons.

The ancient Persians, in addition to the discovery of the ancient "Baghdad Battery" can be included also amongst those whose art shows the knowledge of the tet.

One possibility is that, in regards to the inclusion of various iron compounds, that there is some principle which we are almost aware of, or have to stretch just a little to grasp, that benefits from doing so. I am tempted to say that such a device may be "like a cross between self-nucleating wire and Paul Brown’s 'Nucell Battery', but this may be a mere stab in total darkness. Still, that the battery might incorporate cobalt and iron and utilize some differential between the atomic weights, or apply them as something like a spectral scalar diode, is not that outlandish either.

It may also be that there is something achieved by magnetization of the contents of a battery, at least one such as this. While the red material in the tet in such a case might be iron oxide, or rust, which is not known for its magnetic properties, we must consider that although the technology of magick mirrors is blatantly magnetic, and the indicators of this are virtually relentless, while there are conspicuous and amazing magnetic materials made of the same elements in the same proportions, the materials themselves may not be actually magnetic!

Hence, the "missing principle" of such a wireless battery may be the, if any, "missing principle" of the magick mirrors made of marcasite, pyrite and other "near-ferromagnetics". The word "potential" seems to ring clearly, it is almost as if such a device might somehow convert the physical potential of a near ferric to be the magnetic material that it is so very close to, and convert that potential into electrical potential, if the technology does not head off in the direction of Tom Bearden’s assertions and circumvent a science- our modern science- based on the possibly erroneous notions of "potentials" altogether.

There are other interesting threads, with uncanny spurs, that spin off of these matters. And perhaps where we are led by following the lead will be as eventually astounding as the hyperdimensional physics whose ration of attention has been multiplied greatly due to following the unlikely lead of the proportions and mathematics as the "face on Mars" and its related geographical features. After all, there’s a strong appearance that it, and the Sphinx, may have common creators. Maybe its the same technology, maybe it requires the same view of the universe and its nature.

One of Allen and Sally Landsburg's books delves into the peculiar recorded longevity of certain ancient middle eastern rulers. Their ages are written as numbers like 60, 000 and 70,000 years. They go so far as to speculate that these ancients took perhaps the kind of batteries that are found in archaeological sites in the middle east, and connected them to their endocrines to achieve this effect. As bizarre, or even Frankensteinian, as this may sound, not only with a wireless contrivance such as a tet could they have a reasonable chance of existing in such a fashion without the encumbrance of being perpetually physically wired to a machine, but some of the vignettes of the tet as an old man certainly encourage even more speculation along these lines. The depiction of the tet with eyes may not necessarily tend to contraindicate this either. Fortunately, Nikola Tesla's enthusiasm for unusual application of electricity toward such elements of the human condition helps such a speculation seem even less perverse; fortunate because such a speculation could even prove to be the truth.

It is also a wonderful area of reasoning to suggest the lightning strikes the the Judeo-Christian god allegedly used to direct at "sinners" might have indeed been the result of an atmospheric electrical tension so high that a blush or a spike that would betray any deceit if the deceiver were connected to a polygraph machine might attract lightning, leaving the would-be sinner perhaps to flee to the fabled "den of inquity" so to avoid the lightning stoke by not remaining outdoors. Not coincidentally, these are also the Biblical days of considerably greater longevity such as Methulah's 900-some years.

There are also scenes of various persons on thrones, sometimes Osiris, where the cut-away view shows these thrones to have layers of material very similar to the tet. They are literally, with wry humor, "seats of power". Of course, they may only be figurativisms to associate various persons and themes with the correct physical forces that may be relevant; Osiris, (just like Zeus and many others) and electricity may in many cases be one and the same.

Still, we could perhaps begin more conservatively, if only for the sake of our own credibility, in such a "questionable", or at least controversial, area. The eyes often featured on the tet may simply be used to symbolize that which the eyes respond to, namely light. The tet may possess luminescence when working properly, or it may be used to tell us that its power resembles light, as in Hieronymous' "eloptic" energy, or the way in which superconducted electricity may approximate certain physical properties of light, or even that something constantly associated with light, such as the lotus, may be used to produce the power in the tet. Ultimately, though, the knowedge and versatility of these ancients may be such that all of these are correct.

The icons of ancient Egyptian science may still prove challenging, but not insurmountable. Here, the tet shown with the crook and flail that are as preposterously common as the bird and serpent, so often paired, for which we are hard pressed to find a better thought as to what may be the ancient symbols of a culture that mastered electromagnetism for expressing those very forces.

The flail, used in sorting grain from debris as would be the electrophoretic aegis or nebris-skin, may therefore stand for electricity, while the crook used for grabbing may be therefore the representative of the attactive forces of magnetism. Standing alone with the tet like this, they seem to make it very clear what its basic nature is.

Appearing at left, symbolically grouped here with the crook and the flail, is the curious "bat" staff that appears in a great deal of ancient Egyptian art. With the big eared creature at one end and a possible tuning fork at the other, it's a convincing symbol for sound, adding further weight to an alternative method of levitating stone blocks and the like by the ancients through the mastery of accoustics.

Ancient references to such a technique are found in Andrew Tomas' "We Are Not The First" along with accounts that also describe probable superconductive levitation using paper wrappings.

This vignette may be a sort of unified feild theory, showing the equanimity of magnetic, mechanical (accoustic), and electric forces respectively from right to left. A similar theme can be seen in the Aztec artwork at right.

Ignorance or conspiracy? These views of the "cat-kills-snake" or "Guarding the heart from the 'thief of hearts'" motif, which pertains to ancient Egyptian electronics, seem to undergo curious transformations as they are recopied. The undoubtedly original form, at right, shows the all-important clue: the striping of the lion's tail that can also be found on some of the "tapeworm" style versions of the Ouroboros, helping to show that the snake and the cat are both used as symbols of electricity. He's grabbing it to draw attention to it; in another version the highlighting takes the form of actual radiating lines surrounding the symbolic clue.

In the version at left, the body of the cat has for no apparent reason, been colored in, successfully serving to obscure the clue entirely. Who on earth decided such liberties were in order?

Visitors since December 5, 1998

Home
Return to Ancient Egyptian Anti-Gravity Page
Ancient Egyptian Wisdom: The Magick That Is Science, Part Two

---

This page hosted by Get your own Free Home Page